Small revolver recommendation
Author |
Message |
MOTOBOB
|
Post subject: Small revolver recommendation Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:02 pm |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 8:21 pm Posts: 104 Location: West Concord, MN (cat loving capital of SE MN)
|
I'm looking for a recommendation for a small carry revolver. I'm from the OTHER team and have very little practical experience with carry revolvers. I have heard of some featherweight options, maybe stainless in .357 mag. I have attempted to carry my Super Redhawk with the 9.5 inch barrel in a pocket carry style but haven't been able to make it out the door without the inevitable question of is that a banana in your pocket or are you just glad to see me. TIA =)
_________________ The world is full of idiots and I'm trying hard not to be one. =)
|
|
|
|
|
plblark
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:10 am |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:41 am Posts: 4468
|
I have an airweight Taurus 85 which is a small J-Frame clone. I like it but would go S&W if I had it to do over just based on grip and accessory availability.
If I were buying today I'd look at the Carry Depot or Cabelas with their Visa promotion and get a Scandium 340PD.
Light, .357 Mg or .38, Hammerless, NICE. It's a handful to shoot for sure.
As a carried often, fired little backup piece that's light enough and small enough so you won't leave it in the safe it's a nice piece.
Personally, I'd recommend hammerless in any case (I bought mine with a hammer since I was learning... hindsight is 20/20)
|
|
|
|
|
joelr
|
Post subject: Re: Small revolver recommendation Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:27 am |
|
The Man |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am Posts: 7970 Location: Minneapolis MN
|
MOTOBOB wrote: I'm looking for a recommendation for a small carry revolver. I'm from the OTHER team and have very little practical experience with carry revolvers. I have heard of some featherweight options, maybe stainless in .357 mag. I have attempted to carry my Super Redhawk with the 9.5 inch barrel in a pocket carry style but haven't been able to make it out the door without the inevitable question of is that a banana in your pocket or are you just glad to see me. TIA =) S&W 642; you'll see mine on every Forum page.
_________________ Just a guy.
|
|
|
|
|
brauchma
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:35 am |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:39 pm Posts: 426 Location: Central MN
|
plblark wrote: Personally, I'd recommend hammerless in any case (I bought mine with a hammer since I was learning... hindsight is 20/20)
Would you just get a hammerless so it wouldn't snag on your pockets? I will be getting a PD revolver. I am trying to decide if I want a hammer or not. I like the thought of being able to pull the hammer if I need to and have time. I also wouldn't want to be in a situation where I need to draw it fast and it catches on my pants and I lose.
Couldn't a person get used to "thumbing" the hammer when you draw? Then you could draw and cock the hammer in one motion. I guess it is one more thing to think about though. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
brauchma
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:38 am |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:39 pm Posts: 426 Location: Central MN
|
plblark wrote: If I were buying today I'd look at the Carry Depot or Cabelas with their Visa promotion and get a Scandium 340PD.
forgot to ask... what is the visa promotion?
|
|
|
|
|
plblark
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:44 am |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:41 am Posts: 4468
|
re: cabelas visa, I got the info here:
http://www.twincitiescarry.com/forum/vi ... hlight=252
re: hammerless and thumbing and etc, I'm just a newb myself and not an expert. I've had the hammer catch when taking it out at the range and if I'm in a SHTF situation where the gun is going to come into play I don't forsee having time to cock it anyway. Double action shooting on a revolver does take some getting used to.
I'd wait for some more experienced opinions and explanations.
|
|
|
|
|
TC95GT
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:05 am |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:58 pm Posts: 107 Location: St. Paul
|
I really like my S&W 638 Airweight also known as the "Bodyguard".
It's similar to Joel's 642 except it has a shrouded hammer intead of being totally hammerless. You have the option of single action or double action.
From the S&W website:
When you need a lightweight carry revolver, you turn to Smith & Wesson's Small Frame Airweight Series. They are the original aluminum, small frame revolvers chambered in .38 S&W Special +P.
They are available in three distinct hammer styles – the "Chiefs Special" with exposed hammer, the "Centennial" frame with fully enclosed hammer and the "Bodyguard" frame (.38 S&W Special +P only) shrouded hammer. Three styles with one idea...perfect personal protection.
www.smith-wesson.com
|
|
|
|
|
joelr
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:21 am |
|
The Man |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am Posts: 7970 Location: Minneapolis MN
|
brauchma wrote: plblark wrote: Personally, I'd recommend hammerless in any case (I bought mine with a hammer since I was learning... hindsight is 20/20) Would you just get a hammerless so it wouldn't snag on your pockets? I will be getting a PD revolver. I am trying to decide if I want a hammer or not. I like the thought of being able to pull the hammer if I need to and have time. I also wouldn't want to be in a situation where I need to draw it fast and it catches on my pants and I lose. Couldn't a person get used to "thumbing" the hammer when you draw? Then you could draw and cock the hammer in one motion. I guess it is one more thing to think about though. Thoughts? Okay. So you, in a situation that you think you need a gun out, draw and cock the hammer. Then, as in the majority of such situations, you find that you don't have to shoot.
It's pretty easy, normally, to lower a hammer safely; I'll not go through all five steps now.
But this isn't a normal sort of situation -- you took out the gun because something or somebody scared you badly enough that you thought you might get killed . . . your heart's beating like a triphammer*, fingers trembling from the adrenaline burst, blood flow's altered in your brain, sending more to the little lizard brain and less to the higher function centers . . .
And you really want to lower a hammer now? Are you sure?
_____________________________
*The little devil on my left shoulder is suggesting that I use another, more colorful, and perhaps perhaps not entirely kind turn of phrase involving a person banned from the Forum and a picture of a firearms instructor who doesn't post here; PM me if you want to hear from him.
_________________ Just a guy.
|
|
|
|
|
brauchma
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 11:42 am |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:39 pm Posts: 426 Location: Central MN
|
joelr wrote: brauchma wrote: plblark wrote: Personally, I'd recommend hammerless in any case (I bought mine with a hammer since I was learning... hindsight is 20/20) Would you just get a hammerless so it wouldn't snag on your pockets? I will be getting a PD revolver. I am trying to decide if I want a hammer or not. I like the thought of being able to pull the hammer if I need to and have time. I also wouldn't want to be in a situation where I need to draw it fast and it catches on my pants and I lose. Couldn't a person get used to "thumbing" the hammer when you draw? Then you could draw and cock the hammer in one motion. I guess it is one more thing to think about though. Thoughts? And you really want to lower a hammer now? Are you sure?
Makes sense I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
brauchma
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:10 pm |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:39 pm Posts: 426 Location: Central MN
|
plblark wrote: re: cabelas visa, I got the info here: http://www.twincitiescarry.com/forum/vi ... hlight=252re: hammerless and thumbing and etc, I'm just a newb myself and not an expert. I've had the hammer catch when taking it out at the range and if I'm in a SHTF situation where the gun is going to come into play I don't forsee having time to cock it anyway. Double action shooting on a revolver does take some getting used to. I'd wait for some more experienced opinions and explanations.
WOW! I emailed the link to my wife! If that is going on still, I may buy one on my way to the "New Thing!"
|
|
|
|
|
Pat Cannon
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:19 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:53 pm Posts: 1421 Location: South Minneapolis (East of Lake Nokomis)
|
Goalie & I had a mini-debate about thumb-cocking revolvers a few days ago. It was established that a hammerless revolver is best, i.e. that I was right and he was wrong. Well anyway that's the way I remember it.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremiah
|
Post subject: Re: Small revolver recommendation Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:44 pm |
|
Raving Moderate |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:46 pm Posts: 1292 Location: Minneapolis
|
MOTOBOB wrote: I'm looking for a recommendation for a small carry revolver. I'm from the OTHER team and have very little practical experience with carry revolvers. I have heard of some featherweight options, maybe stainless in .357 mag. I have attempted to carry my Super Redhawk with the 9.5 inch barrel in a pocket carry style but haven't been able to make it out the door without the inevitable question of is that a banana in your pocket or are you just glad to see me. TIA =)
If stainless is a possibility, I'll put my .02 for a Ruger SP101. The one in my avatar (and my carry) is a 3" version with the exposed hammer, but the KSP-321XL model is a 2.25" barrel and "hammerless". Affordable, built like a bank vault- what's not to love?
_________________ I'm liberal, pro-choice, and I carry a gun. Any questions?
My real name is Jeremiah (go figure).
|
|
|
|
|
squib_joe
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:49 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:37 am Posts: 606
|
Personally I think a bobbed hammer is a good way to go in a J-frame; if only so you'll look better at the range
|
|
|
|
|
joelr
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:56 pm |
|
The Man |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am Posts: 7970 Location: Minneapolis MN
|
squib_joe wrote: Personally I think a bobbed hammer is a good way to go in a J-frame; if only so you'll look better at the range Nothing wrong with those; I've got a S&W Model 42 with a factory-bobbed hammer that I like quite a lot.
_________________ Just a guy.
|
|
|
|
|
Pat Cannon
|
Post subject: Re: Small revolver recommendation Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:25 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:53 pm Posts: 1421 Location: South Minneapolis (East of Lake Nokomis)
|
Jeremiah wrote: If stainless is a possibility, I'll put my .02 for a Ruger SP101. The one in my avatar (and my carry) is a 3" version with the exposed hammer, but the KSP-321XL model is a 2.25" barrel and "hammerless". Affordable, built like a bank vault- what's not to love? That's exactly what I carry. It's 25 oz. which makes it maybe the heaviest 'J-frame-class' revolver out there, but that's not all bad if you're going to shoot .357 magnum ammo, as anybody who's shot magnum ammo out of a super-light alloy snubby will tell you! Even so, the first time I shot .357 through it, I went out and bought the cushy Hogue monogrip the next day.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.
All times are UTC - 6 hours
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|