|
|
It is currently Tue May 21, 2024 9:37 am
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.
All times are UTC - 6 hours
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
The "metro" exception as enacted
Author |
Message |
kimberman
|
Post subject: The "metro" exception as enacted Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:26 am |
|
Wise Elder |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:48 pm Posts: 2782 Location: St. Paul
|
Minn. Laws 2009, Chapter 176. It isn't much of a "victory."
Quote: Sec. 40. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 97B.045, is amended by adding a subdivision to read: Subd. 3. Exceptions; hunting and shooting ranges. (a) Notwithstanding provisions to the contrary under this chapter, a person may transport an unloaded, uncased firearm, excluding a pistol as defined in paragraph (b), in a motor vehicle while at a shooting range, as defined under section 87A.01, subdivision 3, where the person has received permission from the lawful owner or possessor to discharge firearms; lawfully hunting on private or public land; or travelling to or from a site the person intends to hunt lawfully that day or has hunted lawfully that day, unless: (1) within Anoka, Hennepin, or Ramsey county; (2) within an area where the discharge of a firearm has been prohibited under section 471.633; (3) within the boundaries of a home rule charter or statutory city with a population of 2,500 or more; (4) on school grounds; or (5) otherwise restricted under section 97A.091, 97B.081, or 97B.086. (b) For the purposes of this section, a "pistol" includes a weapon designed to be fired by the use of a single hand and with an overall length less than 26 inches, or having a barrel or barrels of a length less than 18 inches in the case of a shotgun or having a barrel of a length less than 16 inches in the case of a rifle: (1) from which may be fired or ejected one or more solid projectiles by means of a cartridge or shell or by the action of an explosive or the igniting of flammable or explosive substances; or (2) for which the propelling force is a spring, elastic band, carbon dioxide, air or other gas, or vapor. Pistol does not include a device firing or ejecting a shot measuring .18 of an inch, or less, in diameter and commonly known as a "BB gun," a scuba gun, a stud gun, or nail gun used in the construction industry or children's pop guns or toys.
Sec. 41. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 97B.051, is amended to read: 97B.051 TRANSPORTATION OF ARCHERY BOWS. Except as specified under section 97B.055, subdivision 2, a person may not transport an archery bow in a motor vehicle unless the bow is not armed with a bolt or arrow.
But, it does make it clear that the "hunters" have no respect for those who participate in handgun sports even on a "shooting range."
|
|
|
|
|
MostlyHarmless
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:18 am |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:24 pm Posts: 471 Location: 12 miles east of Lake Wobegon
|
This is complicated enough that hunters probably won't want to rely upon it even if they can.
|
|
|
|
|
Binky .357
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:16 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 3:02 am Posts: 816 Location: South of the River Suburbs
|
So if I'm reading that right, Scott County got dropped from the "no shooting cans in my rural backyard" zone?
_________________ My YouTube Videos
"We're either gonna be the best of friends or there's gonna be a whole lotta shootin' goin' on."
"I think it's a good thing for serving cops to mix with non-cops in a situation where they understand that they aren't in charge." -JoelR
"You'd be amazed at the things a bullet can stop." -Old Irish Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
kimberman
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:43 pm |
|
Wise Elder |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:48 pm Posts: 2782 Location: St. Paul
|
Actually, (a)(2) and (3) pretty much cover everywhere in Hennepin, Ramsey, and Anoka counties (and on 10 days notice, ANY other land could be included merely by passing a local ordinance). So the "carve out" [b]isn't needed to ptotect anyone from Uncased, Unloaded firearms.[/b]
So, inquiring minds want to know, WHY did the DFL leadership INSIST on inclusion of this language???
Maybe they DO have something planned that the bill's proponents just ignored. After all, a "pistol" ban won't affect them (NOTE: "Pistols" are expressly excluded from the special privileges that this bill offers riflemen and shotgunners).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.
All times are UTC - 6 hours
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|
|