Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Wed Jun 26, 2024 4:06 am

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
 URGENT: Hunter "convenience" bill SCREWS metro re 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:14 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:41 am
Posts: 4468
Do you have the e-mail addresses that go with that?

_________________
Certified Carry Permit Instructor (MNTactics.com and ShootingSafely.com)
Click here for current Carry Classes
"There is no safety for honest men, except by believing all possible evil of evil men." - Edwin Burke


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:52 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 180
Location: St. Paul
plblark wrote:
Do you have the e-mail addresses that go with that?


No just the form that is on the website. :(


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:35 pm 
Wise Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:48 pm
Posts: 2782
Location: St. Paul
realtor_packing_heat wrote:
Andrew Rothman wrote:
Please post the NRA contact info!


This is what I used


These people are NOT employees of the NRA or of NRA-ILA. They are volunteers who try to "get out the vote."

They are good guys BUT writing them will NOT move the organization one inch.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:31 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 180
Location: St. Paul
Who does the NRA listen to? How can we wake them up? Are they not willing to admit they may have been asleep the wheel?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:37 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:41 am
Posts: 4468
kimberman wrote:
realtor_packing_heat wrote:
Andrew Rothman wrote:
Please post the NRA contact info!


This is what I used


These people are NOT employees of the NRA or of NRA-ILA. They are volunteers who try to "get out the vote."

They are good guys BUT writing them will NOT move the organization one inch.


Thanks for the info.

When the guys on the ground are getting inundated with e-mails and calls, they have a way to get back to the heart of the beast.

_________________
Certified Carry Permit Instructor (MNTactics.com and ShootingSafely.com)
Click here for current Carry Classes
"There is no safety for honest men, except by believing all possible evil of evil men." - Edwin Burke


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:42 pm 
Journeyman Member

Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:53 pm
Posts: 74
Location: Up Nort'
I have contacted my State Rep and Senator for where i live, the ones for next door right across the county line and even sent on to Rep. Dill. I am a very rural homeowner but still don't feel the laws for the people in the Cities should be any different then here.
Now to wait and see who responds first.

_________________
"A cubicle is nothing more than a padded cell without a door"


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:49 am 
Journeyman Member

Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:11 am
Posts: 69
Location: In limbo....
I emailed Cornish, Dill, and Seifert. The only one who even bothered to respond was Seifert, who told me he was not aware of the new language in the bill, but would look into it.

I'm sorry, but the snide response from Cornish that was posted here pisses me off so badly that I want to say all kinds of things which would probably land me in a great deal of trouble.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:09 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:46 pm
Posts: 845
Location: Saint Paul
peckerhead wrote:
I emailed Cornish, Dill, and Seifert. The only one who even bothered to respond was Seifert, who told me he was not aware of the new language in the bill, but would look into it.

I'm sorry, but the snide response from Cornish that was posted here pisses me off so badly that I want to say all kinds of things which would probably land me in a great deal of trouble.


Yes, refrain from any disparaging remarks about Cornish. Remember, he is one of the "good guys". :roll: :roll: :roll:


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:12 am 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:56 pm
Posts: 1109
Is he?? Think about it. Maybe he WAS a good guy, but has changed



Quote:
Yes, refrain from any disparaging remarks about Cornish. Remember, he is one of the "good guys". :roll: :roll: :roll:


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:38 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:46 pm
Posts: 845
Location: Saint Paul
JimC wrote:
Is he?? Think about it. Maybe he WAS a good guy, but has changed

Quote:
Yes, refrain from any disparaging remarks about Cornish. Remember, he is one of the "good guys". :roll: :roll: :roll:


I'm sorry you missed the sarcasm. I tried putting it on rather thick. :lol:


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:40 am 
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:19 pm
Posts: 38
Location: Mankato
I sent all the listed representatives this:
Quote:
Dear Representatives,

I urge you to oppose H.F. 1238 as it has language defining the seven county metro area as "different" than the rest of greater Minnesota. This is untrue and could open doors to anti-gun legislation, making anti-gunners think that pro-gunners agree the metro is "different" and needs more stringent gun laws than the rest of the state. This will lead to a patchwork of gun laws across the state--a nightmare. Please stop this now.

Sincerely,


and received two emails back from Tony:

Quote:
Im voting yes and I am the co author of the bill. What have you heard about it and from whom?

Tony


and about two hours later:

Quote:
You are wrong in your assumptions and I'm voting yes.

Tony


Apparently he's rather adamant...


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:01 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:36 am
Posts: 702
Location: St. Paulish
Apparently "were wrong." I'd like to hear his explaination for that statement.

_________________
Proud owner of 2 wonderful SGH holsters.
"If man will not work, he shall not eat" (2 Th 3:14)
"If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" -Jesus (Luke 22:36)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:46 pm 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:20 am
Posts: 1317
Location: Racine, MN
Apparently, Tony thinks the issue is like the firearm deer hunting laws, where different laws are applied to different zones. For example, in some zones you are limited to a shotgun, handgun, or black powder rifle, while you can use a centerfire rifle in other areas. I am more concerned with the possible effects on preemption. This bill just isn't worth the risk.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:50 pm 
Journeyman Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:36 pm
Posts: 95
Location: SE suburbs of St Paul
With all due respect to Rep Cornish and hi past work on behalf of gun owners in the state, When a person becomes a criminal because he crossed some arbitrary county border it is Rep Cornish who's got it wrong.

I wish I knew why he is clinging to this so hard. Is it perhaps that, as Jeremiah pointed out in and earlier post in this thread, that the Senate
version does not contain the "metro area" language and he thinks that the language in the final bill will not include it. I don't know.

_________________
Life Member-National Rifle Association
Life Member-Ctizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
Minnesota Permit to Carry holder
Member-North American Hunting Club
Veteran - US Army


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:21 pm 
Journeyman Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:36 pm
Posts: 95
Location: SE suburbs of St Paul
After a number of emails sent in the last week I finally got this response.
Quote:
I'm voting yes.

Tony

I'm holding back on replying that he has sold us out and given the anti gun legislators their dream come true in the process.
I'm beginning to think the honeymoon is over between Cornish and gun owners.

_________________
Life Member-National Rifle Association
Life Member-Ctizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
Minnesota Permit to Carry holder
Member-North American Hunting Club
Veteran - US Army


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group