Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Sat Jun 15, 2024 9:18 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 
 2006 Hunting Regs and P2C 
Author Message
 Post subject: 2006 Hunting Regs and P2C
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:36 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
Looks like they are getting closer to making sense.

Quote:
ARMS RESTRICTIONS
Firearms Transportation
A person may not transport a firearm, including a handgun, in or
on a motor vehicle unless the firearm is:
• unloaded* and cased;**
• unloaded* and in the closed trunk of a motor vehicle; or
• carried under a valid permit to carry a pistol or handgun



Quote:
Handguns
Persons age 18 or older may carry a handgun in the woods and
fields or upon waters to hunt or target shoot. Persons under age 18
may carry handguns for hunting if in the actual presence or under the
direct supervision of the person’s parent or guardian, and if they meet
firearms safety requirements (see page 20). A person may not carry a
hand gun while bowhunting except a person may take bear by archery
while in possession of a firearm. Questions regarding handguns
should be direct ed to local law enforcement authorities.

The “Concealed carry” provisions apply to certain hunting activities.
Persons with a permit under this law generally may carry their
handguns uncased and loaded while hunting, and while traveling to
or from hunting locations by motor vehicle under the hunting firearms
transportation laws. However, possession of the handgun while
'shining' or while hunting deer by archery would still subject the possessor
to the provisions of these laws (see page 33, artificial lights, for
more info).



Quote:
Possession of Firearms Before, During, and
After the Firearms Deer Season
(Note: This section does not apply to the Muzzleloader Season,
see page 86, except that muzzleloaders legal for deer may be possessed
only by persons with a muzzleloader or all-season deer license during
that season.)
No person may possess a firearm or ammunition outdoors during
the period beginning the fifth day before the open firearms season
and end ing the second day after the close of the season within an area
where deer may be legally taken by firearms (see page 32), except:
• A person who has a valid firearms big game license in possession
may hunt big game during the open season with a firearm and
ammunition authorized for big game.
• Possession is also legal under these conditions:
a) An unloaded firearm that is in a case or in a closed trunk of a
motor vehicle.
b) A shotgun and shells containing No. 4 buckshot or smaller
di am e ter lead shot or nontoxic shot.
c) A .22 caliber rimfire handgun or rifle with .22 caliber short,
long, or long rifle car tridg es.
d) Handguns possessed by a person with a carry permit.

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 1:00 pm 
Journeyman Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 56
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Ummm.... not to pick a nit.... put why is this posted here?

_________________
Erik Schminke
PS: This is what part of the alphabet would look like if "Q" and "R" were removed.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:48 pm 
Forum Moderator/<br>AV Geek
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:56 am
Posts: 2422
Location: Hopkins, MN
Probably because the DNR originally thought their rules trumped the permit to carry. This is more proof that they have accepted that they cannot prevent permit holders from carrying.

The first quote makes it sound like permit holders can carry long arms loaded in a vehicle...

_________________
Minnesota Permit to Carry Instructor; Utah Certified CFP Instructor


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 3:39 pm 
Journeyman Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 56
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
That makes sense, but in the "Posted Victim Disarmament Zones"? Seems like more of a MN Carry issue, or even a General Carry issue than anything else. I was just confused by it is all.

_________________
Erik Schminke
PS: This is what part of the alphabet would look like if "Q" and "R" were removed.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:09 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:40 am
Posts: 3752
Location: East Suburbs
Much closer to being fully above board in their communication. :)

_________________
Srigs

Side Guard Holsters
"If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking" - George S. Patton


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:54 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
I just checked my dog-eared 2005 regs and they are the same as 2006 actually. For some reason I thought they had changed. I must have been thinking of the 2004 regs.

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group