Twin Cities Carry Forum Archive :: View topic - D'amico Eden Prairie no longer posted

bab wrote:

Anyway, they used to have a sign that was so non-compliant (Picture of housewife in apron awkwardly holding an AK) that I wasn't sure if it was a satirical poke at the anti's, or was really an attempt to ban guns. Either way, it is down now.

bab wrote:

Yup, that was the sign, or a derivative there of.

joelr wrote:

Actually, it's compliant -- right font, right size; the extra verbiage doesn't obscure the required language.

Author:	bab [ Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:22 pm ]
Post subject:	D'amico Eden Prairie no longer posted
I thought I'd started a thread here stating that they had posted. Came back to say the sign is now down, but can't find my original post. Perhaps I dreamed the whole thing. Anyway, they used to have a sign that was so non-compliant (Picture of housewife in apron awkwardly holding an AK) that I wasn't sure if it was a satirical poke at the anti's, or was really an attempt to ban guns. Either way, it is down now.

Author:	grayskys [ Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:05 pm ]
Post subject:
Well I remember seeing the poster...

Author:	Pakrat [ Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:35 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'amico Eden Prairie no longer posted
bab wrote: Anyway, they used to have a sign that was so non-compliant (Picture of housewife in apron awkwardly holding an AK) that I wasn't sure if it was a satirical poke at the anti's, or was really an attempt to ban guns. Either way, it is down now. Do you mean the Rake's sign? $18.95+S/H http://www.rakemag.com/rewards/store_de ... tCatID=220

Author:	WestSideGuy [ Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:55 am ]
Post subject:
Sweet sign!

Author:	bab [ Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:08 am ]
Post subject:
Yup, that was the sign, or a derivative there of.

Twin Cities Carry Forum Archive http://forum.twincitiescarry.com/

D'amico Eden Prairie no longer posted http://forum.twincitiescarry.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2408	Page 1 of 1

Author:	doctor_strangelove [ Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:33 pm ]
Post subject:
They had the same sign out in Golden Valley. Perhaps they had a policy change, or just got tired of the sign... Speaking of annoying signs, that 'talking' sign with R. Lee Ermey at Bill's has to go.

Author:	joelr [ Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:37 pm ]
Post subject:
bab wrote: Yup, that was the sign, or a derivative there of. Actually, it's compliant -- right font, right size; the extra verbiage doesn't obscure the required language. Glad it's down; I like the chain.

Author:	bab [ Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:27 pm ]
Post subject:
joelr wrote: Actually, it's compliant -- right font, right size; the extra verbiage doesn't obscure the required language. Actually I don't think it was compliant. The font in the one they had up was definitely much smaller than Andrew's example. I'm not sure, but I think the wording was also changed, and it was posted far from the entrance, with no signs at the other two entrances. I think it was the typical stradle the fence kind of posting, i.e. put up something you can point to if you have to if anti's complain, but keep it small and unobtrusive, to avoid scarying people who don't give a crap. Actually... that gives me an idea. I think I'll post an idea in the strategies section.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/